RHYTHMIC STRESS / TENSIUNI ÎN RITM
co-curated by Alex Radu and Charles Moore.
exhibition/graphic design: Justin Baroncea, Maria Ghement, Horia Lungescu, Alexandra Müller, Ioana Naniș, Larisa State
curatorial assistance: Anne-Marie Lolea, Lidia Dobrea, Natalia Marin
production assistance: Sergiu Chihaia, Iulian Cristea, Diana Dobrovăț, Răzvan Ene, Diana Ivanes, Bianca Manea, Cristian Matei, Alex Rîță, Răzvan Țurcanu
RHYTHMIC STRESS / TENSIUNI ÎN RITM
07.04-27.06.2026 /SAC @ BERTHELOT
artists: 111invers1, Hoda Afshar, Justin Baroncea & Cristian Matei, Cecilia Bengolea, Marius Bercea, Julius von Bismarck, Monica Bonvicini, Codruța Cernea, Sergiu Chihaia, Iulian Cristea, Alexandra Cojocaru, Nicolae Comănescu, Mara Cucu, Roberta Curcă, Simona Deaconescu, Aukje Dekker, C. B. Evans, Fronte Vacuo, Aristotle Forrester, Maria Ghement & Alexandra Müller, Dumitru Gorzo, Xenia Hausner, Gregor Hildebrandt, Madeline Hollander, Anne Imhof, Christian Jankowski, Barbara Kapusta, Julia Kowalska, Oliver Laric, Ligia Lewis, Ioana Marchidan, Tincuța Marin, Marta Mattioli, Jacopo Mazzonelli, Lucy McRae, Alex Mirutziu, Rachel Monosov, Ciprian Mureșan, Vlad Nancă, Gilberto Aceves Navarro, Marcus Nelson, Andrei Nițu, Mike Pelletier, Caroline Poggi & Jonathan Vinel, Rebeca Rădvan, Haleh Redjaian, Aki Sasamoto, Larisa Sitar, Edra Soto, Asia Stewart, Mircea Suciu, Monika Szpunar, Ovidiu Toader, Virginia Toma, Tanin Torabi, Jorinde Voigt, Judith Wagner, Nives Widauer, Kristin Wenzel, Leyla Yenirce
*
“Rhythmic Stress” is an inquiry into movement, the movement of bodies, of breath, of images, of language, of architecture, of power. It is an exhibition conceived at the intersection of dance, performance, contemporary art, and spatial practice, where rhythm becomes both a material condition and a political force. Approaching movement not as ornament or spectacle, the conversation instigated by these works becomes a primary strategy for negotiating tension: tension between stillness and eruption, control and release, endurance and collapse, private sensation and public consequence. In this sense, “Rhythmic Stress” positions movement as a response to violence, loss, systemic injustice, and the accumulation of micro-events that shape our bodies long before they become legible as history.
At its core, the exhibition asks how rhythm, understood as a temporal, corporeal, and social structure, operates under pressure. How does stress manifest in the body? How is it rehearsed, absorbed, resisted, or transformed through gesture, repetition, breath, and spatial navigation? And how might dance, choreography, and performative practices offer models for survival, protest, acceptance, or collective recalibration within societies permeated by inequality and rupture?
“Rhythmic Stress” considers movement as a way of thinking and as a way of being. It frames dance, performance, and embodied action as both deeply personal and irreducibly political gestures. These are modes of resistance and repair that operate across scales, from the intimate to the structural. Rage, grief, and exhaustion coexist here with release, liberation, and forgiveness. The exhibition rather creates a field in which contradictory states are allowed to cohabitate, collide, and reconfigure rather than demand resolution.
The exhibition is situated within a broader curatorial commitment to examining what brings us together, what separates us, and how relationships between bodies, communities, and systems are continuously built, negotiated, and contested. Within this framework, “Rhythmic Stress” foregrounds the shared concerns of architecture, contemporary art, and performance. The artists accentuate the ideas of rhythm and counter-rhythm, spatialization and flow, duration and interruption, the choreography of attention, and the politics of presence. The exhibition space itself acts as an active participant. It is an architecture that breathes, resists, compresses, and releases alongside the works it hosts.
Visitors are invited to move through the exhibition as one might move through a score or a choreographic structure, with heightened awareness of tempo, pause, proximity, and orientation. The audience’s journey becomes an integral component, sliding continuously between self-performativity, perception, and representation. Passing through the space is an embodied experience that implicates the viewer’s own breath, posture, pace, and responsiveness.
The conceptual structure of “Rhythmic Stress” is informed by a five-dimensional matrix of permeable metaphors that operate simultaneously rather than hierarchically. Breathing and dance function as embodied metaphors for survival and continuity, the most basic yet most vulnerable rhythms of life. Breath is understood as a site of negotiation between autonomy and regulation, panic and control, intimacy and exposure. Gesture, in turn, becomes a metaphor for everyday micro-reactions, the small, often unconscious responses through which stress is registered, stored, or deflected within the body.
Dance, movement, and performance expand these metaphors of micro-reactions into highly expressive manifestations. They externalize what is otherwise internalized, rendering visible the ways bodies carry history, ideology, and trauma. Choreography operates here as a metaphor for choice, planning, and conditioning. It is a way of organizing bodies in time and space that resonates with how societies structure behavior, enforce norms, and regulate dissent. In this sense, choreography becomes both a tool and a question, capable of reproducing systems of control while also offering pathways for disruption and reimagination.
The exhibition itself adopts choreographic logic. Works are positioned in relation to one another through rhythms of density and dispersion, intensity and restraint. Sightlines, thresholds, and pauses are treated as compositional elements, shaping how attention accumulates and dissipates. The exhibition space becomes a score to be activated by bodies moving through it, emphasizing the continuous negotiation between individual agency and collective flow.
The title, “Rhythmic Stress”, operates through deliberate opposition and multiplicity. Drawing from musical composition, the term evokes techniques used to generate anticipation, unease, and accumulated energy through the manipulation of duration and accent. Syncope, polyrhythm, rubato, accelerando and ritardando, ostinato, and the dramatic pause all serve as structural references, not only to music but to time-based art, visual composition, and embodied practice.
At the same time, the title gestures toward the lived experience of contemporary life. It names the tension between the relentless acceleration of events and the limited capacity of the body to process them. In a world where crises unfold faster than they can be metabolized, where political violence, ecological collapse, and social unrest are encountered in rapid succession, rhythm becomes fractured, breath becomes shallow, and stress becomes chronic. “Rhythmic Stress” seeks to hold space for this condition, acknowledging the dissonance between external tempo and internal sensation.
Rather than offering catharsis alone, the exhibition insists on duration. It asks what it means to stay with discomfort, to inhabit tension without immediate release, and to recognize stress as both a symptom and a signal. Through this sustained attention, “Rhythmic Stress” proposes movement as a method for mapping, enduring, and potentially transforming the pressures that shape contemporary existence.
Here, we enter a site of collective attunement. It is an invitation to listen to bodies, to spaces, to silences, to rhythms that have been interrupted or suppressed. By foregrounding movement as both content and method, “Rhythmic Stress” creates a shared environment in which personal experience intersects with political reality and where the act of moving, together or apart, becomes a way of imagining other forms of relation, resistance, and care.